Construction projects and disputes
When a construction project turns legally, technically or financially difficult.
Support in disputes between owners, contractors, general contractors, architects and planners.
- A negotiable position
- Controlled cost and litigation risk
- Durable settlement or clear court strategy
Typical situations
- Defects, delays, change orders or cost overruns
- Unclear responsibility between planning and execution
- Condominium or neighbourhood conflicts
Method
- Structure contracts, minutes and technical documentation
- Secure claims, deadlines and evidentiary issues early
- Escalate only where it improves the outcome
Aims
- A negotiable position
- Controlled cost and litigation risk
- Durable settlement or clear court strategy
Context
The focus is procedural clarity: secure documents, define roles, quantify risks and decide whether negotiation, mediation or enforcement is the right path.
Frequently Asked Questions
When should I involve a construction lawyer in a dispute?
It is best to involve a construction lawyer as soon as significant delays, cost overruns, or defects become apparent. Early intervention allows us to secure evidence, clarify contractual responsibilities, and often resolve the conflict through negotiation before it escalates to costly litigation.
What is the difference between mediation and litigation in construction disputes?
Litigation involves a judge making a binding decision, which can be time-consuming and expensive. Mediation is a voluntary, confidential process where a neutral mediator helps the parties find a mutually acceptable solution. Mediation is often faster, more cost-effective, and preserves business relationships.
Discuss a construction dispute
Assess the matter
An early assessment clarifies deadlines, risks and the most useful next step.